Welcome Guest | RSS
Welcome to science club
Site search
Site menu
Indian Heritage
Social bookmarks
Home » 2016 » July » 27 » Genetic Code is More Diverse than We Think
9:24 AM
Genetic Code is More Diverse than We Think

Genetic Code is More Diverse than We Think

New research is casting doubt on a widely held belief about how cells use DNA to make proteins.

DNA molecule. Image credit: Christoph Bock, Max Planck Institute for Informatics / CC BY-SA 3.0.

DNA molecule. Image credit: Christoph Bock, Max Planck Institute for Informatics / CC BY-SA 3.0.

Cells take a number of complicated steps to translate their sequence of basic DNA building blocks into proteins, which then act as workhorses to carry out the vital functions of life.

Since many different proteins are encoded on a single DNA strand, the cell uses markers to know when to start and stop making a protein.

Many biology textbooks say that the start marker, called a start codon, always encodes for a compound called methionine.

“New research by our team suggests the textbooks could be wrong,” said Dr. William Duax, a structural biologist at the State University of New York at Buffalo.

“We have ample evidence that hundreds of the oldest ribosomal proteins still start with a valine or a leucine code and do not have the codon for methionine in the DNA,” said Dr. Duax, referring to proteins found in basic cell components called ribosomes.

“We have found unequivocal evidence that the earliest species on Earth are still using a primitive form of the genetic code consisting of only half of the standard 64 codons.”

The results are contradictory to a widely held belief among biologists.

“There are significant errors in textbooks,” Dr. Duax said.

“The universal code is not universal and all species now on Earth do not use a code ‘frozen in time’ as claimed by Watson and Crick.”

“Some basic assumptions about evolution are incorrect.”

“The results raise questions about some aspects of a hypothesis on the origins of life, called the RNA world, which posits that RNA, which is similar to DNA and is still used in cells, was the first genetic material.”

Dr. Duax and co-authors obtained their results by combing through a database that contains the sequences of more than 90 million genes.

The genes encode proteins and the team used new techniques to accurately identify all members of each family of proteins and distinguish them from all other families that have remained unchanged for 3 billion years.

The scientists developed programs to expedite the complete capture and perfect alignment of families of proteins having 25,000 members and encompassing all species for which genomes are reported.

From those perfect alignments biologists could identify the precise location and function of the most conserved residues in the alignment, meaning the proteins that have stayed the same for the longest period of time.

From these primordial proteins the team found evidence that the oldest proteins do not start in the standard way or use many of the other parts of the standard codes for making proteins.

In addition to changing the way we look at genetic coding and rewriting textbooks, this work has applications in genetic therapies that exploit structural details of bacteria to develop therapies that are selective and have fewer side effects.

Dr. Duax and his colleagues presented their findings today at the 66th Annual Meeting of the American Crystallographic Association in Denver, Colorado.


William Duax et al. 2016. Primordial Proteins had No Cysteines, Tryptophans, or Methionines, Started with a Valine, and Used No Codons Ending in Adenine.Abstracts of the 66th Annual Meeting of the American Crystallographic Association, paper #1702

Views: 436 | Added by: Team-scienceclub | Rating: 0.0/0
Total comments: 0
Live feeds update
Flag Counter
This Website Visits
Site news
Google +